Community Cohesion in the Czech Republic

I am about to spend a couple of months in the Czech Republic. I find it really interesting to compare experiences there and in the UK. It helps put things into perspective.

The biggest shock to me was after multicultural East Oxford and Lambeth was the overt and pretty universal racism against the minority Roma (gypsy/romany population) . Recent news has been very depressing. There was a march by the 500 far-right demonstrators through the predominantly Roma (gypsy) area of Prirov early this month, followed by others in other towns. Then a Roma family had their house firebombed, both mother and father were badly burnt but the worst injuries were incurred by their daughter of 22 months who has 80% wounds.

These incidents reveal a dark side to the country that I love. The racism against the Roma minority (they make up less than 3% of the population) is widespread. It came as a great shock to hear middle-class educated Czechs talk about the Roma in a way that would be unacceptable among similar people in multi-cultural Britain. Indeed the comments and anti-Roma jokes were similar to those that I heard in my youth in the 1970s Britain and even then were considered dodgy in the circles I moved in. Then there is the presence of the far-right, something I realised when a local proudly showed me a fascist tattoo on his arm. It is the acceptance of racism at all levels of society that allows such attitudes to thrive.

Amnesty International has just released a report on the plight of European Roma and highlighted the educational discrimination against Roma children, who despite it being unconstitutional are sometimes sent to special schools for children with mental difficulties. This really goes to the heart of the problem. While Roma children are segregated and educationally deprived, then there is little hope of improving the situation .

10 Laws Of Evaluation

I don't claim to have come up with these (apart from the last one), but I have searched the web and can't find it anywhere. So here are the laws of evaluation and monitoring:

1. The law of inverse attention
   This law states that the smallest expenditures should be subject to the greatest control and review procedures, and the largest expenditures should be subject to the least. The same is true of performance measures
2. The dream to reality ratio (or the law of diminishing attention)
   The biggest investment should be in dreams (planning and starting up projects) and only a modest investment made on reality (evaluating the results and closing the projects down). The ratio is usually 5:1. A corollary to this law states that buy-in by other stakeholders is most important in the dream stage and not when the activity starts to deliver results.
3. Strategy rules over experience
   This law states that it does not matter whether a project has been successful or not, merely whether it fits in with the latest strategy.
4. Fire, aim, ready
   This law requires that actions should be rationalised after being undertaken and not before.
5. The scale dependent nature of evidence requirements
   The larger the possible impact of a policy the less stringent the evidence requirements should be
6. The scale dependent nature of failure
   This law requires that small projects that show signs of failing to achieve their objectives should be closed down, as soon as possible. Large projects that show signs of failure should be given more money.
7. History began 3 years ago
   Staffing should be designed to ensure that no one has more than three years’ experience of delivery of the project. It is especially important that the staff who manage the project and those who designed it should not be the same.
8. Evaluators can't count
   Or they don't.